08 January 2010 @ 12:38 am
Weight is a constant struggle. I could work out for two hours five times a week, and lose nothing- look exactly the same.

It's very frustrating. I work out a lot at school, to no avail. I think I may study up on a proper diet. Maybe what I eat, while not being a lot, because it's not the healthiest, doesn't help me. I would think of a strict calorie restriction, but I can't do that. I don't have the discipline.

I guess the best bet is to keep working out and just wait. Maybe the first month or so is useless? I'll ask Claire. She lost a lot of weight. Or maybe I'll up my workouts from 10 hours a week to 15-16? That seems like so much time, though. An unhealthy amount of time.

Of course, since I've been home, I haven't worked out at all. I've been too tired, too lazy to do anything responsible like that.
Tags:
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 06:39 pm


Sandi Toksvig interviews Garrison Keillor on Excess Baggage. Download here (until Saturday)

Will return when brain has finished exploding. 8|
Tags: ,
 
 
Current Location: work
Current Mood: weirded out
Current Music: guess
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 08:19 pm
I don't know WHAT happened, but for some reason, my camera caught my eyes looking this crazy-ass green today. I've never seen them THIS color before. Ever, even when I'm like bawling.



Is it possible it's because I had it on red-eye setting and it just... removed all the brown? My hair is still brown, though. How ODD.
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 07:35 pm
Question: Can Spectral Hand be used to deliver the touch attack for a spell-like ability (or was that supernatural?) from a Reserve Feat (from Complete Mage or Complete Champion)?
 
 
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 05:28 pm
GOP candidate running for the Governorship of Massachusetts is shattering fundraising records.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/01/06/bakers_funding_shatters_records/
 
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 10:33 am
So Britain has been hit by ... WINTER. I was listening to the many tales of wonder and woe on PM* and idly wondering what conditions might be like in Wheathampstead, which is very small and down a hill, and what Cherry would make of all the flailing. And then this came up:

Some sought to nurture the plucky British spirit. The Royal Society of Chemistry said it would award a £300 ($475) prize to the person it deemed "the most dauntless traveler" during the freeze.

The society said the prize would recognize "outstanding fortitude and resolution or selflessness" in the face of meteorological adversity.

The award commemorates the centenary of the start of Robert Falcon Scott's ill-fated Antarctic voyage. Scott reached the South Pole in January 1912, but perished with four companions on the return trip. The society named its award the Cherry Prize after Apsley Cherry-Garrard, a survivor of Scott's expedition who recorded the trip in a book, The Worst Journey in the World.

Text copied from this article except for the part where I italicised the title because I know HTML


<3

*I love PM. Love it with a big fat sloppy virtual kiss. MWAH.
 
 
Current Location: work
Current Mood: awwwwww!
 
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 11:38 am
Rhett Reese & Paul Wernick, writers of Zombieland, have been selected to write the Deadpool movie screenplay.

I haven`t seen Zombieland myself, but I did hear good things about it. So...this could be awesome? A Deadpool movie with solid dark humor writers and the best actor ever for Deadpool (who`s a fanboy too!) is a pretty hopeful combination. What do you all think?

Thanks to [info]rivian for the heads-up.
 
 
Current Mood: excited
Current Music: Matthew Good - Volcanoes
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 04:31 pm
What follows is a recounting of the major events I encountered at MAGFest this year:

Read more... )

If you were at MAGFest and we bumped into each other, feel free to post here so we can catch up!
 
 
Current Mood: nostalgic
Current Music: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 10:16 am
SO IT BEGINS.



Man, the dogs are going to be bored out of their minds cooped up inside today.


Site Meter
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: SNOW!!!
Current Music: Heather Nova - "Winterblue"
 
 
 
07 January 2010 @ 04:54 am

So imagine a survey asking respondents to name their No. 1 favorite baseball team.

Now imagine this survey is sent out to every member of the Yankees Fan Club.

And that the bylaws of the Yankees Fan Club explicitly state that any member not naming the Yankees as their No. 1 favorite baseball team will have their membership revoked and will be shunned as illegitimate enemies of baseball should they ever respond to such a question with any answer other than "the Yankees."

What do you think such a survey will produce?

Exactly. And that's just what we have here in the National Association of Evangelicals' year-end survey asking "America's evangelical leaders" to list the "top moral issues facing America."

Survey respondents, appreciating that keeping their status as one of "America's evangelical leaders" requires them to regard opposition to legal abortion as the paramount moral issue of all time, unsurprisingly listed abortion as their No. 1 "top moral issue."

(Yep, another abortion thread for Flame War Thursdays.)

It's interesting that these leaders listed as their No. 3 moral issue: "mistreatment of others." Read what you will into the separate categories, but I think I catch a whiff there of the suggestion that concern about abortion is, for these folks, distinct from their claim that it is a form of mistreating others.

The No. 2 moral issue listed by the evangelical leaders surveyed was "moral relativism." It seems a bit ironic that so many respondents gamely playing along with a rank-the-moral-issues opinion poll would earnestly answer "moral relativism." If they don't see the irony in that, I fear I won't be able to explain it to them.

If you're surprised, by the way, that homosexuality didn't appear in the Top 3, don't be. This is covered under "moral relativism," a catchall category referring to any failure to condemn those things the speaker believes the Bible teaches we must condemn. (That's what the Bible is for, after all, providing a list of Stuff to Condemn.) Ask the survey respondents to provide an example of "moral relativism" at work and the conversation will quickly turn to homosexuality and to the horrifying failure of younger evangelicals to inveigh against it with sufficiently convincing disgust.

I'm not wholly sure what to make of the fact that the evangelical leaders surveyed unanimously interpreted the phrase "top moral issues" negatively. If I were asked to provide my own list of the Top 3 Moral Issues Facing America I'd be tempted just to crib from St. Paul and answer, "Faith, hope and love -- and the greatest of these is love."

Yet love, oddly, does not seem to be what these folks regard as a "moral issue."

So to cooperate with their unspoken rule that "moral issues" must mean moral ills, I would have to reply not with my Top 3, but my Top 7: Lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride. (I stole that list, too.)

And the greatest of these is pride.

At least that's what we Christians have insisted for 2,000 years or so now. Just as love is the cardinal virtue, pride is the cardinal sin.

If I were further asked to supply evidence that pride remains, today, the "top moral issue facing America," I might start out by pointing to a recent survey conducted by the National Association of Evangelicals in which prominent religious leaders asked to describe the greatest moral issues of their time seized the opportunity to preach their favorite sermon, the text of which is to declare that they are themselves much, much more virtuous than those nasty, evil, baby-killing relativists.

 
 
 
06 January 2010 @ 10:57 pm
I have only just read the most recent Discworld book on account of a saga involving Amazon.ca, DHL, and a number of other factors too boring to go into. But a long train trip from New Orleans to LA gave me the perfect opportunity to catch up.

Before I say anything more I want to make it known that I was not disappointed. When you read what I have to say it may sound an awful lot like disappointment, but it wasn't, as such – unlike some books I could name I do not regret the time spent reading it, and the only standard to which I am holding it is the extremely high standard set by some of the other books in the series. It did not disappoint me: it provoked a number of thoughts which were probably unintended, and not exactly flattering, but mainly tangential to the book itself.

A Stream of Consciousness on the Theme of Unseen Academicals (with one medium-sized spoiler and an awful lot of rambling) )
 
 
Current Location: home
Current Mood: pensive
 
 
06 January 2010 @ 07:40 pm
Okay, this happened over the [GM]Dave Blackout of 2009, but I thought it was worth sharing.

Some of the guys at work decided to organize a secret Santa thing. You know, everyone draws a name and gets that person a relatively inexpensive gift so we all feel like friends and not just the random people I happen to sit next to for 8 hours a day.

Merry Christmas, random meat bag.

Still, it was a simple way for me to justify receiving an extra present, so what the hell, right?

I mean, we all kind of know how the freaking secret Santa system works. You spend 15 or 20 dollars on something they want and you get something you want in return. None of this retarded clothes or socks or underwear bullshit that various relatives try and pull.

Plus, we all work for a video game company. How hard is it to figure this shit out? You go to Gamestop and buy something between 15 and 20 dollars.

Or a gift card. Just buy a gift card.

It's not impersonal. It's efficient.

So, we're opening our little secret Santa gifts. Were kind of going around in a random order, but the general trend seems to be holding true. Pretty much everything is video game related and everyone is quite pleased.

See? Easy.

Then I get to my gift.

Someone hands me a cylindrical gift. I immediately assume that some mistake has occurred until someone points out that my name is on it.

Oh, joy. My secret Santa has gone off script.

I open it and inside is a mug.

A mug.

Like a coffee mug.

A coffee mug that says "You don't have to be crazy to work here... But it helps."

Hi-freaking-larious.

No, no. There had to be something else around here for me. I look inside the mug. I look in the wrapping paper. I look around the room.

Nope... This is it.

A... Mug.

You know, they say it's the thought that counts.

Apparently, my secret Santa thought "Gee, how can I be the biggest prick in the history of the world? Hmmm...Oh, I know. Mug."

Who the F&%@ gives someone a mug for Christmas? Do I look like an 80 year old woman?

Spoiler: No.

A mug is never, ever, ever considered an acceptable Christmas present.

Ever.

See, there are two types of people: people who drink coffee and people who don't. People who drink coffee already have mugs and people who don't drink coffee don't need mugs.

It is an entirely useless gift. You might as well buy them a card that says "I don't know anything about you. F&%@ you."

I was searching for the words to express my feelings when I heard someone say "You're welcome."

...

No, it was not meant ironically.

I tried to look happy. I really, really did. I smiled and everything.

I don't know how the mug slipped out of my hand.

I really don't know how it hit him in the side of the head.

One of those freak things, I guess.

You know what wouldn't have hurt hitting him in the side of the head? A FREAKING GIFT CARD!

Honestly, who gives someone a mug?

Thius is why I hate people.
 
 
 
06 January 2010 @ 09:19 pm
My absolute favorite part of the movie was the fact that Holmes's incredibly ugly dog was named Gladstone.